Weeknights 5 PM CT
on AFR

May 29, 2024 · 49 minutes

NY Judge Merchan is presiding over a kangaroo court.

Play episode48:58. Keeps playing while you browse.

Taller bars mean faster talk at that point in the show. Tap any line of the transcript to play from there.

The Hamilton Corner logo above Abraham Hamilton, III on the show's set

Show notes

0:00 - 15:00. Mark 4:21-24. The wisdom of God must be applied to our lives. 15:00 - 31:00. NY Judge Merchan is presiding over a kangaroo court. 31:00 - 48:00. Our nation looks a lot like the biblical description of Judah before Babylonian exile. Video Clip Links 4-4-4 Split CA Assembly Bill

Phone lines mentioned

  • 17958461830
  • 17958816182

Share this episode

Transcript

7,104 words, in two-minute parts. Made by machine, so a few words may be off.

0:0048:58

  1. 0:00

    Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the Hamilton Quarter on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite. Delivery people out of the bondage of mainstream media. And the philosophies of this world. God has called you and me to be his ambassador. Even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. and now, the Hamilton Corner. Good evening, everybody! Welcome to the Hamilton Corner here on American Family Radio, I'm your host, Abraham Hamilton, the third. Hoo boy, torn by. Ahem, the corner contingent right across from me, my man $100 grand, Mr. Bobby, errosa. And in the screening room, we have perhaps produced extraordinary or often imitated with duplicated the real J Mac, ladies and gentlemen, And we're ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you are making your transition from your part time jobs where you generate an income to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. As you do so, I want to remind you to do it with intentionality, understanding the primacy that God places on the family. Remember what goes on in your house is far more important than what goes on in the White House and living in times as we are today every single one of us must Make sure that we are going about our father's business You know I was Bobby now we're talking just before coming on to the air You know people often forget because there's lots there's lots of conversation And I understand why because of the prominence of you know of Daniel and Ezekiel and Daniel's friends as right hand and I miss out a whole deal, but about a century prior to the Babylonian conquest and exile of the southern kingdom of Judah, the northern kingdom of Israel was actually exiled by the Assyrian Empire first and there's you know an entire chapter where the Lord goes piece by piece explaining What happened in the northern kingdom that ultimately culminated in its conquest and exile?

  2. 2:35

    And those people often forget that the property lie, Jia was sent to the northern kingdom of Israel. The property lie, Jia was sent to the northern kingdom of Israel. And if you ever wondered what that looked like, if you would have been alive during those events prior to the ultimate judgment applied by the Lord, you're living through it right now. And we think about Isaiah 59, Justice is turned backward. Uprightness cannot enter. Truth has fallen in the street. And when we go from, not now, collectively our society is confused about what a boy is, what a girl is. We have a woman sitting on the United States Supreme Court, but she can't tell you what a woman is because of course she's not a biologist. And we have, you know, a judge presiding over a trial with the presidential candidate that is leading the polls, currently generally speaking, yet the judge issues instructions to a jury in a trial concerning the candidate, talking to my Mr. Trump, and saying, you know, jury, you know, whatever you think the crime could be, you guys can be, you can disagree about what the crime is, as long as you agree that there is a crime, then I'll take it as if you're unanimous. Dudes putting the K in can go rude. These are the types of things that the Bible has diagnosed, guys. when the halls of justice are supposed to be bulwarks of uprightness, but it's complete opposite of that, collectively. Now I'm not talking about individual instances that are stratified of, you know, here and there. I'm talking about when it becomes societal, when it becomes broadly applied, you know, we've entered another place.

  3. 4:35

    But before we get to that, I again want to reemphasize that what happens in your house more important than all of that before we become consumed and what's happening at the national level and even on the global level. My question to myself, which I offer to you as well, what are we doing in our personal lives? Are we conduits for the love of God? Are we obeying with the Lord that's commanded us? Are we placing our hands to the plow that God has presented before us? Has put before us? That is what we each must ask. examine ourselves to see whether or not we are living according to the faith that we profess. And if you have not yet placed your eternal hope in the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords, today is the day to do so. With the uncertainty and the instability that's prevalent in the world around us, it should all the more drive you to once again consider the eternal weight of glory that is resplendent in the Christ that has died for your sins and for mine. Today let's turn into the book of Mark, the book of Mark, Mark 4 verses 21 through 24. Mark 4 verses 21 through 24. This is following the recording of the teaching of the parable of the soils in Mark's gospel you'll recall. If you're not aware, Mark was recording the words of Peter. So when Peter is conveying these things, Mark is documenting these things. When you look into the Gospel of Mark, you're looking into actually one of the oldest of the four Gospels, the oldest actually of the four Gospels. But I want to focus you to one particular portion of this text that is vital to embrace, vital to understand because in the midst of all of the, that the highlights of this accountants scripture, there is a portion here that I think, I don't think I know that if we neglect, we will miss a critical component of our own of our own sanctification. So Mark chapter four, verses 21 through 24, this is what the word of God says, and he said to them, as a lamp brought in to be put under a basket or under a bed and not on a stand, for nothing is hidden accept to be made manifest, nor is anything secret except to come to light. If anyone hears, I'm sorry, if anyone has ears to hear, let him hear. And he said to them, pay attention to what you hear. With the measure you use, it will be measured to you, you and still more will be added. That is what I want you to note today. And he said to them, pay attention to what you hear with the measure you use. It will be measured to you and still more will be added to you. I am so grateful for the word of God and the teachings of Jesus and the miracle that we have the word of God conveyed to us in our vernacular scripture because this is a vital component of our growth in our relationship with Jesus Christ and our walk with Him.

  4. 8:16

    As Jesus is discussing the parable of the soils, he's speaking to, and you read earlier, you can see this, that there were people present at this portion of the conversation that included the Jesus' disciples and beyond them. And then he had a particular audience with his disciples. You know, we've explained before, the seed in the parable of the soils the word of God, the seed is not money, was not money, never was money. The reference to 30, 60, and 100 full was a produce developed from the word of God. It wasn't money, goodness. But Jesus then says, and he's drawing really from Isaiah's prophetic teachings when he says, if anyone has ears to hear, let them hear. If anyone has ears to hear, let them hear. building on that those who do have ears to hear pay attention give attention turn your attention turn your focus to what you are hearing and what you have heard why for what the measure that you use what you have heard not just hurt have heard it you see the measure with which you use what you have heard more will be be measured, will it be measured back to you? And even more will be added to that. The very simple principle, and this is something that I refer to, especially when people ask for my advice on occasion, they may say, hey, I hit this particular juncture, this particular decision is before me, or this circumstances before me, I don't quite know what to do here, I need some wisdom. I'll often respond, is there any area in your life where God has already given you wisdom, but you're not putting it into practice. See, Jesus reveals right here a principle that is enduring for Christ followers, that God gives us ears to hear, not only to hear.

  5. 10:20

    Hearing is a vital part, but not only to hear, but with the measure that we use what we hear, will it be measured to us? Often the impediment to additional clarity, an additional wisdom for, for circumstantially applicable revelation is that God has already shown us direction that we haven't put into practice yet. God has already given us instruction and direction, but we've just been slowing uptake. Sometimes it could seem like this is a unrelated phenomenon. Like for example, the scripture commands husbands in Peter's Epistles. Husbands dwell with your wives in an understanding manner so that your prayers won't be entered. And so many times I've talked to brothers on the one side of the man, this and this going on, I have that going on, I have these going on and I'll ask, man, how's your relationship with your wife?" And they'll be like, what? What does that have to do? It's what I'm asking you about. And so I'll remind him of that scripture. What is the Lord commanded us to do with our wives and our understanding manners so that our prayer won't be in, prayers won't be in there. See, God's a desire for us brothers and sisters. It's not to be people to what we just, we consume knowledge, we consume information. We, as the Apostle Paul says, ever learning, whenever coming into knowledge of the truth, that we're consuming and consuming and consuming and consuming and consuming, but never applying anything. Y'all know the type of people whose personal lives could be all kinds of chaotic, but they have all of the advice and counsel in the world for everyone else. I would simply remind you that the role of the Christ follower is not merely to be one who proclaims, but it's one who proclaims and lives, the speech and feet phenomenon, that what we live testifies and what we speak testifies. And there is consistency between what we live and what we speak.

  6. 12:23

    Here Jesus is being recorded right in the middle of discussing the parable of the soils and saying he who has ears to hear, if you have anyone who has ears to hear, let them hear. To the next immediate notion, for those of you who do have ears to hear, praise God, having ears to hear is not merely a natural phenomenon, but having ears to hear by the spirit of God, that he has opened our hearts, minds and ears to his word, to his voice, to insight, to revelation. If you have ears to hear, pay attention. Pay attention. Give heed to the word of God. Give heed to what the Lord has provided us in his word. And not just know it, not just read it, not just memorize put it into practice. But with the measure you use, with the measure you use, the Hebrew writer says it in a different way. By reason of use, we have our senses exercise to discern, right from wrong. By reason of use, by reason of use, James said that we are to be not here as only, but do as other words, it is a consistent principle throughout scripture. In this instance, Jesus is revealing the fact that with the measure that you use what God has already shown you will additional circumstance appropriate insight and revelation be given. I talked to a brother on the phone today and his brother came to faith in Christ later in life and he said to me, man, Abe, I used to always hear about Christians talking about the joy of being a Christian and I didn't understand that because to me, I didn't see it and feel all of and it wasn't until I realized that joy in Christianity is reserved for the obedient Christian. Say the joy of the joy in Christianity is directly consumed and concealed, if you will, within the obedience to Christ.

  7. 14:32

    I say, man, John 15, 11, Jesus said that, your joy will be made full and obeying my Word. My simple exhortation today is with the measure that you use, that you apply, that you employ the inside of God's Word will more insight revelation be afforded to you, not just for consumption, but for application to life. I'd like to take a minute and have a heart to heart with you. If you're able, place your hand over your heart. Can you feel it? My strong heartbeat reminds me that I'm alive. It's the same for an unborn baby. The heart begins to form at conception, and at just three weeks is already beating. At five weeks, a baby's heart can be heard on an ultrasound. That's where pre-born steps in, rescuing 200 babies every day from abortion by simply providing a mother with a free ultrasound and allowing her to hear her child's heartbeat and see their perfectly formed body in the womb. By six weeks eyes are forming. By ten weeks a baby is able to suck his or her thumb. Preborn needs our help to save these precious babies. For just $28 you could be the difference between the life or death of a baby. All gifts are tax deductible. To donate just dial pound two fifty and say the key word baby. That's pound two fifty baby. Or donate securely at preborn.com. It's preborn.com. Shining light into the darkness, this is the Hamilton Corner, an American family radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton the third here. It is the obedient Christian whose life is filled with joy.

  8. 16:34

    There's no joy in being a willful, knowledgeable rebel. I'm just telling you. And really, that's what enemy likes to keep a lot of people. You know too much about the Lord to really go full on worldly, even though you stay worldly adjacent. But you're too worldly. You take joy and give it all to the Lord and give it all. Full surrender. Full surrender is the order of the day. The summer travel season is upon us. Next week we will be in Richmond, Virginia at the Home Educators Association of Virginia Conference, H-E-A-V at the Greater Richmond Convention Center. and sixth through the eighth. We will be broadcasting on site this program. We'll be broadcast from there. So I definitely invite you to tune in for that. If you're in the area, well, then they come to the area, we'd love to meet you in person in Richmond, Virginia. And the very next week, we'll be at the home Rocky Mountain Homes, Rocky Mountain Homeschool Conference in Denver, Colorado, at the Tech Center there. go to Rocky Mountain Homes School Conference there to register. And then July 18th through the 20th, sorry, in Denver it would be the 13th, June 13th through the 15th. And it's back to back weeks to travel. And then July 18th through the 20th, we'll be in Bartlett, Tennessee, right outside of Memphis, Tennessee at Faith Baptist Church at the Culture Proof Conference. Go to cultureproof.net, cultureproof.net. To register, you do have to register for each of those events. And I'd love to see you there. All right, following our conversation yesterday, I have to discuss, I'm telling you, Judge, Judge Merchant in New York puts the K in Kangaroo Court because I wanted, I guess it just wanted a way to see how he would address it because I told you about the arguments that the lawyers were having concerning the jury instructions.

  9. 18:49

    The jury instructions or the jury charge is how some lawyers refer to it as are the instructions concerning the law that the judge gives to the jurors. A good way to understand this, that in a jury trial, the judge serves as the judge of the law, the jurors serve as the judges of the facts, the jurors assessment of the facts in determining the culpability or lack of the guilt or non-gilt of the charge party. They receive the instructions concerning the law from the judge. As I've explained to you before, I take great umbrage at the consistent description of the New York trial going on right now of former President Trump as the hush money trial because that is in fact not what is being tried. The actual threshold crime that was charged, which is actually a misdemeanor. Yes, a misdemeanor from New York State statute. I'm looking for my sheet that has the exact statute upon it. Yes, New York, New York election law, 17 dash 152 is a misdemeanor. That's standing on its own. The state of New York would be time barred due to the statute of limitation from prosecuting Mr. Trump concerned in this misdemeanor because the statute of limitation expired in 2019. This refers to the 2016 election. So there's no way to proceed currently on an expired misdemeanor. What Alvin Bragg attempted to do is to zap into life, new life, and expired misdemeanor by alleging there is an additional crime that in itself would also be a misdemeanor. But it pertains to federal election law, which the state of New York, last I checked, doesn't have the authority to enforce federal election law. Yet it is the allegation of an additional misdemeanor that Alvin Bragg is attempting to say, but it can be a felony because it was employed for quote, unlawful means, unlawful electoral means.

  10. 21:04

    Well, today the jury was given the jury instructions and sent to deliberate and the deliberations for today have concluded, but the judge and given the instructions to the jury literally said to the jury, this is hardly to say, but this is what happened, that you jurors can decide which of the underlying features comprise the second crime. So the first, as I mentioned, is the business record, falsifying business record. So whatever the second crime is, you all can decide, you can split between yourselves, four of you can think it says one thing, and he gave them three options. I have never seen this in my entire life. Now, granted, this is an unprecedented phenomenon of prosecution in the first place, but I have never seen a judge say, well, you guys can decide which of these fit and if you can even be split for and for and for, and I'll take it as if you've unanimously decided I've never seen that in my entire life, never seen that in my entire life. As a prosecutor, each crime that you try has elements to the crime. The law, the US Constitution, in addition to the state laws, require each of the elements of the crime to be charged beyond a reasonable doubt. So just to make it simple in a homicide case, you have to not only prove the homicide, you have to also convey the manner and means of the homicide. If I'm alleging that John Doe shot Sally Q, I mean, that John Doe murdered Sally Q by means of strangulation. I can't at trial then go and show where the only way that Sally Q's life was lost was by a gunshot wound. That would be me failing to be my murder of proof because I've alleged strangulation, but now I'm saying it's a gunshot wound, you can't change that in the middle of a prosecution.

  11. 23:07

    Because the Constitution says that every charge party is entitled to be informed of exactly what it is they've been charged with. and the burden of proof rests solely on the prosecution this is one of the features of the american criminal justice system that is distinct from europe for example where there is no fifth amendment purposes against self-acrimination whether bertons doesn't wrestle in the prosecution if you charge the crime in england that charge party also has a duty a burden to prove their innocence but that's not happening here guys this this is mind-boggling to me as an attorney and former prosecutor, that this is actually happening, which is why I have advice for the Trump team. But before we get to that, I want you to hear this. I'm not the only one saying these types of things. Listen to and watch clip number one. This is Andy McCarthy talking about this kangaroo activity going on in New York. Clip number one, go. Well, let me ask you about the three choices. And one thing in particular that this judge said that these jurors could do. He just delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. He said that there is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 4, 4, 4, and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean? Well, it's really outrageous because in a normal criminal case, Every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case, you know, you have to rob, it's got to be a financial institution, you have to show intent. Those are the things that jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony.

  12. 25:11

    Because remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime. And here the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, what makes it a four year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less. But it's also what gets us into the courtroom because if this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case with a flaps in 2019. So the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly. And yet now the judge is saying, you know, you don't have to agree on what the felony is. Guys, this is outrageous. And this type of reasoning is actually, this is circular reasoning because you have the instant crime, which is the business records case, right? Which is the dead misdemeanor. And I'm saying dead in terms of it expired in 2019, the right to prosecute that. All right, so you have the dead misdemeanor for usifying business records. But is zapped back into life by saying, well, the business record violation occurred because it was meant to influence the election of 2016 by unlawful means. So what is the unlawful means? The business record violation. So you're back to the misdemeanor that's dead, which is why I know that this judge is not being specific in detailing for the jury what the underlying crime is to be. Now that being said, there is no law that I'm aware of that allows a jury to convict a charged party of a felony, of an unspecified felony. And you offer a multiple choice. You offer a smorgasborg of options to a jury and you say, well, y'all pick one. Whichever one, three of you can say it's this, four of you can say it's this, And whatever you think, we'll treat that as if it's unanimous.

  13. 27:16

    Guys, that dog ain't gonna hunt. I can just tell you, there was one final state that homicide convictions in this country that have a life sentence all requiring unanimous juries. The only state that was an outlier was Louisiana, my home state. The US Supreme Court overturned previous convictions because the state of Louisiana allowed convictions to have split juries with 10 voting for conviction. If you have two that would vote for your quittle, the charge party can still be convicted. The Supreme Court corrected that. If, and I'm gonna talk more about that, if Mr. Dropper is convicted, he should appeal immediately to the US Supreme Court, using the Bush v. Gore precedent, because some of you may recall, some of you may be a little younger, you may not recall, but when you had the issue of the electoral voting process that was navigating through the Florida State Court system, The Bush v. course, the Bush v. Gore case, interceded within the Florida state procedures because there was this important thing you might have heard of it before. A presidential election is what was going on. So if Mr. Trump is convicted, because here's the thing, the law is what it is. There's no way, there's no way, there's no. This guys, this is absurdly on a whole nother level. I mean, you have to take into consideration, Judge Merchant's daughter, I'm gonna give you her name. I have her name right here. I believe it's Lisa Lauren. I'm sorry, Lauren, Lauren Merchant just so happens to be a major fundraiser for the Democrat party, raising millions of dollars for the Democrat party. Yeah, that's not a conflict of interest in him presiding over. I don't know. I mean, this case should have been thrown out at the motion of quash level. The indictment should have been quashed was lack of specificity.

  14. 29:18

    How do you know what you're even defending against if the judge can't even specify for the jury what the underlying charge is that makes this misdemeanor also all of a sudden prosecutable as a felony? The judge can't even tell the jury which what it is. How then can you have an indictment to inform a defendant of what they're protecting what they're defending against? This is just this is absurdity on a whole other level. I mean, this is outrageous. I have been in courtrooms where you've had cases where there's clear evidence of guilt factually, but because a prosecutor did not detail the appropriate jurisdiction. For example, when I say each element of a statutory offense has to be proven beyond the reason without using the hypothetical of the homicide case, the prosecutors have to put on evidence that the homicide occurred within the jurisdiction where the prosecutor is operating. I cannot say using Harris County where I used to work. If the criminal defense happened in Montgomery County, I don't have the law for the authority to bring the trial in Harris County. So one of the elements I would have to prove, and it would seem like, well, that's just, you know, just a technicality, Abe, yes, law is technical. This is why we would say, well, I didn't got off on the technicality. Law is technical. If I am the prosecutor for Harris County, I do not have the authority to prosecute cases that when the offenses occurred in Montgomery County. So one of the elements that has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that the offense occurred within the jurisdiction where the prosecution is being, which is taking place. Yet, you have the judge literally saying, all right now, jurors, you have the business records, crime, that's one. Now in order for this to be a felony, you guys can decide which other one you think it may be.

  15. 31:18

    And I'll give you three choices. Guys, this is insane. This is a whole another level of insanity here. This is an entire new level of insanity. And I get it. These guys want to have their names and lights. They hate Donald Trump so much so that they're throwing all of this. Guys, this is absurd. This is absurd on a whole another level. And so you have, if it were not for New York, Manhattan, I can't even imagine. Imagine you might have a miss might happen in San Francisco, but only a few jurisdictions would allow this hence My advice to the Trump attorneys Before I get to that, let me give you guys the deliberation Deliberation started this morning at about 1137 a.m. Eastern time They concluded this afternoon The jury has requested read back of certain aspects of not surprisingly the jury instructions and a read back from the transcript of some of the witnesses testimony deliberations will resume tomorrow morning at 9.30 a.m. Eastern. But if this jury returns, a verdict of guilty. The Trump team should immediately file an emergency appeal with the United States Supreme Court immediately, using the Bush v. Gore president as the standard for doing so. Just as the Supreme Court intervened in the Florida State Court proceedings because of the subject matter, Yeah, no. The presidential election. Mr. Trump should do the exact same thing. Hamilton Quarter podcast and one-minute common Terrence are available at EFR.net back to the Hamilton Quarter on American Family Radio.

  16. 33:24

    Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton the third here. This is this is this is this is. We are here, folks. We're not we're not headed here. We are here. All right. In addition to the absurdity that is taking place in New York, today Justice Samuel Alito made an announcement. I didn't talk about this a whole lot as it was unfolding because I knew what the play was. I knew what the play was. So, the last, I guess, week and a half, you've had folks like the New York Times and the Sleeze Buckets and MSNBC. Did I say that all out? I didn't mean to say that. You have the MSNBC folks that are just bitterly partisan, always looking for, it's like, it's straight out of the Communist Manifesto, the objective in the priority is always the agenda. That's what it always is. And so in the last couple of weeks, you might have heard some of the consternation brewing over Justice Samuel Alito, first of all, having an upside-down flag outside of his vacation home in New Jersey for a few days in early 2021. Not to be outdone, the New York Times and others took issue with, oh my gosh, oh, not Justice Alito. He's always show that he's a, he's a, he's an insurrectionist himself because he also had an appeal to heaven flag outside of his home.

  17. 35:28

    And if many of you are aware of this, some of you may not be aware, but the appeal to heaven flag dates back to the American Revolutionary time period from George Washington and our founding fathers because their position was that the British government, the British Crown and Parliament had violated God given rights, the God given rights of the American colonists. So the simple notion that undergirded the American Revolution was that the King George and them was functioning illegally and they were appealing to an authority that superseded King George, right? You might have heard some of this sentiment in this document. Was it called again, Bobby? Um, um, yeah, the Declaration of Independence. Behold, American ideal that, you know, it's kind of falling out of vogue with lots of regresses in our day and age. You might have heard the young one on MSNBC who literally thought it was a, it was a screed of the clan to, what, you believe, rights come from God? Yes ma'am, so did all of our founding fathers, our Declaration of Independence and your state constitution. We hold these truths of be self-evident that men are endowed by their creation with certain inalienable rights, unalienable rights. Yes, yes. And you had, you know, the paper of record, the New York Times literally going berserk saying, Oh my gosh, Justice Alito may be a Christian nationalist. Well, the game that's played, and this is always how the game is played. The game was played in an effort to get Justice Alito to voluntarily recuse himself from the January 6 case, from the immunity case frankly, that's pending before the Supreme Court right now.

  18. 37:29

    That's what the goal was. That's what the goal was. Like when every of these things happened guys, they had never random, and never random. So to see all of a sudden, it wasn't like they just discovered this. And this is the thing they kind of held in the fine print at all the news reporting. The first flag that I reported on was outside of his home in 2021. It's not like they just discovered it yesterday. But these folks are professional liars. This is why I call them Gerbil Zink. They are the propaganda outfit to shape the perspective of the masses to empower fascist decimation of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I don't want to put too fine a point on it because frankly, Gerbil, Joseph Gerbil's, could right to be described as aiding and abetting murder. And in many instances, the propaganda outfit in America and the American providence doing the same thing, especially when you consider the scores of unborn American citizens who would be alive right now, but been slaughtered in the mother's womb. And in some instances, even thereafter, after they've been delivered, or some who have been murdered via partial birth homicide, where the labor is induced for the purpose of murder. It's unconscionable, really. It really is unconscionable. So I knew what the game was. I was like, man, I'm not giving these people any air. And y'all are not gonna control what we talk about because I knew exactly what it is. And so, Justice Alito knew exactly what it was too because he came out today and he announced that he is not recusing himself. He said specifically, the two flags flown at my home do not meet the conditions for recusal.

  19. 39:31

    As I have stated publicly, I had nothing to do, I'm sorry, I had nothing whatsoever to do with the flying of that flag. I was not even aware of the upside down flag until it was called to my attention, in quote. But again, it was a popular campaign, a popular pressure campaign to get him to voluntarily recuse himself, because they don't know what else to do. So they're gonna try everything in their power. There was no need to recuse based on that. And it's amazing to me with all the other things that are happening that the times cannot be bothered, with Mr. Biden's lawlessness, him bragging at Morehouse, he had a Supreme Court, he said, I couldn't cancel student loan, so I'm gonna find another way to do it. So they don't see that as lawlessness. All of the things they said President Trump would do, that's what literally Biden is doing, literally, but they can't be bothered with that. They can't be bothered with that. So I applaud Justice Alito for not falling under the sway of these crazy sycophants, man. And it is true, there is absurdity, abounding in our society. But there are people in various places, in various stations across our country, and across the body politic, that are standing against this. And I will reiterate that the last, most impactful bastion in our society that has not fallen in totality is the Lord's Church, the remnant. I'm not talking about, you know, the most visible professional church. I'm talking about the remnant, which is why there's a consistent and concerted effort to try to force the Lord's remnant to capitulate to the spirit of the age because they know they're still a remnant. Now, I want you to see this video next, because there's a, there was a particular measure pending in California, assembly bill 1955. There's been lots of conversation.

  20. 41:40

    because California legislators and policymakers are intent on making sure all things LGBTQIAP plus are not only established but celebrating in that any dissent or any notions of the contrary are scuttled. Thanks to assemblywoman Kate Sanchez, she shared some video from a legislative here in concerning Assembly Bill 1955, which is a bill that they're literally trying to establish a policy, trying to pass a policy that will eliminate the requirements of the school's to notify parents of a child's efforts to, quote unquote, socially transition at the school. And so you had a pediatrician with decades of experience treating children specifically for gender dysphoria. I'm saying, guys, this is not a good idea to try to hide this from parents. This is not a good idea. You're saying you want to do this because you want to help the child. You're not helping the child. I want you to watch this and what I particularly want you to note is how the Senator Josh Newman, I believe is his name, tries to cut the doctor off. And you tell me whether or not people like Senator Newman in the state of California actually want to hear the wisdom of a medical practitioner in this field or if he's being governed by a commitment, a prior commitment that will foreclose his willingness to even consider wisdom for someone who's helped, who's been serving and working with children in this field for decades. This is clip number two. Listen to and watch clip number two. Go.

  21. 43:42

    So if the parent doesn't know about this, if the parent is totally totally kept in the the dark over what's going on. Yeah, the kid is at far more risk. And oh, by the way, the kids who start doing this transition are far more likely to enter the medical, the medical parts and the surgical parts. And the only, giving the devil's advocate to the folks who think this is a good idea, the only justification that was ever really brought up that said, oh we should probably do this is to prevent suicide and now we see that's not happening in fact the people are going through this transition are more likely to commit suicide as adults and that's the reason that the dutch close these and the uk close these and nearly all of europe has closed this but and that's doctor that's fine that's fine but i i think well that's a huge deal i'm saying you appreciate your concern i appreciate this and i'm not saying it is fine did you hear that dot doctor that's fine Wait a minute, he's called to provide expert witness testimony as a pediatrician working in his field. But Senator Newman is not interested in hearing what the doctor has to say. What's the, what's the, follow the science? Unless the science goes in a direction that I'm not interested in following. I'm presenting this to you guys because and many of you know this already, this is a novel information, but I want you to understand that it is not science is driving these conversation. It's not a stute study of the issue. It's combination of self-effectives. One, politics. Two, money. Three, and this is probably the most potent and I know this is going to make some people uncomfortable, but I'm going to tell you, say it anyway, demonic activity. You literally have people saying it is this Senator Newman is a it's better for the child.

  22. 46:05

    To undergo something like this, and the parents not know about it. That's better. That's better. The doctors literally said, no, actually it's not better. I have, I treat children in this field. There are other nations who tried this, who used to think what you think, and they have now reversed it because they recognize, no, it's not that better. I saw a cartoon once it was a political cartoon, And it basically had an illustration of all of the wreckage and carnage that communism has caused all throughout history. And he had one new dude, it was like with that idea like, well, I got an idea, a better way to do communism, as if his efforts will be different from... And it reveals that really the pride that is involved in it. It is a delusional pride. It is a delusional arrogance. It is a delusional hubris. And the pinnacle of that delusion is for man to think, Hey, you know what? We know better than God. Cause if you think it was out of order for Senator Newman to cut off the good doctor doing his committee testimony, it's really just a tangible representation of really what people like Senator Newman are doing. And in their effort to cut God off. You know, I'm reminded of different prophets in the scripture. You know, when, when Asa in his latter years, the scripture records in his latter years, instead of being reliant upon the Lord as he was in his younger years as king of Judah, he refused to rely on the Lord and then suffer the consequences and the Lord sent to prophet Hanonai to confront him in this instance of rebellion. And the scripture records that King Asa lashed out against Hanonai and often say, Hanonai was a tangible outlet for, for Asa's lashing out. Who do you think, Who do you think Aesa was really lashing out against?

  23. 48:20

    The real object of Aesa's going was God. Han and I was just an immediate, tangible instrument. In spite of all that is transpiring, it further confirms the fact that God's word is true. And it's true that it's underscored not only by this current insanity, but also by the hope that we have at the end of this. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.

Subscribe and never miss an episode.

Pick your platform All Episodes
Latest episode Book Abe