Weeknights 5 PM CT
on AFR

Oct 17, 2024 · 49 minutes

Presidential candidate Kamala Harris showed why she doesn’t do standard journalistic interviews.

Play episode48:48. Keeps playing while you browse.

Taller bars mean faster talk at that point in the show. Tap any line of the transcript to play from there.

The Hamilton Corner logo above Abraham Hamilton, III on the show's set

Show notes

0:00 - 15:00. Isaiah 2:7-8. Have we become nose-blind nationally? 15:00 - 31:00. Presidential candidate Kamala Harris showed why she doesn’t do standard journalistic interviews. 31:00 - 48:00. Bevelyn Beatty Williams was sentenced to 3.5 years in federal prison and two years of probation thereafter for standing for life. www.afaaction.net/life To donate call : 877-616-2396 Video Clip Links Yahya Sinwar Bret Baier & Kamala Harris Bevelyn Williams Ricky Williams

Phone lines mentioned

  • 877-616-2396
  • 18467133774
  • 18467142650
  • 18466998333
  • 18466891043
  • 18467086276

Share this episode

Transcript

7,663 words, in two-minute parts. Made by machine, so a few words may be off.

0:0048:48

  1. 0:00

    Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite. Delivery people out of the bondage of mainstream media. And the philosophies of this world. God has called you and me to be his ambassador. Even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. And now the Hamilton Corner. Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton, the third here host of the program joined by the corner contingent right across from me, my man, 100 grand, Mr. Bobby. Rosa, you know, he's recovering from the pre-show show. We always have a pre-show show before we open these microphones. I know why Jeff don't like to come in for the pre-show show. I don't know. He's delicate, you know. He's like, I can't come in there too rough inside. I'm kidding. Jeff Mack is producing extraordinary often imitated, never duplicated some tribe of many fry. Some might even grow wings so they can fly. They might even lie, but we won't deny the cost is low, but the price is high. Well, let me stop. Snaps. Thank you for tuning into the program today. I'm still recovering from that Brett Bear, Kamala Harris interview that I saw after I left the studio last night, oh boy. You know, I don't even really want to talk about it, but I will. But I will also discuss what it immediately made me think of. And I'll get to that in a moment at this very moment. Many of you, not most of you, are making your transition from your part-time jobs where you generate an income to your full-time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do it with intentionality.

  2. 2:03

    I know we are in the throes of an election season. Early voting has already started all around the country. I believe Georgia started early voting this week. Election day is November 5th. Even though that is the case, we should never forget that what happens in our homes, what happens in your house is far more important than what goes on in the White House. That's the truth. Election season doesn't change it. doesn't mean we shouldn't vote absolutely I'm encouraging everybody to vote into cast and informed vote not just to vote emotionally or ignorantly but to cast and informed vote. Do your research do your homework. I know a lot of attention is is given to the top of the ticket with the presidential election but you have to understand there are 34 U.S. Senate seats that are available that are up for election right now. All right you have every House of Representatives seat that's up for election right now. You have very state legislatures you have have elected officials in your various states that are up. You have municipal elections. You have school board elections. Be informed. And cast an informed vote. But make no mistake about it, outcome cultivation must be pursued even more vigorously than our civic engagement. We should engage civically, absolutely. By God's grace, I voted in every election I've been eligible to vote in after turning 18 years old. make sure that's correct. I think I might have missed my first one, because I turned to 18 when I was in college. And I think I might have missed that one, but thereafter, the very next one, and from every election after that, I have been consistent in my civic participation. There's a long story that goes into that. But glory to God, glory to God. Watching that, you know, and I'm gonna describe this more when we get to it, But if you, I don't really think the interview last night changed anybody's minds, you know, and I really don't think there are too many people at this juncture who don't have their minds made up.

  3. 4:08

    There may be a few, but I don't think that moved anybody. And it just exposes something that is just gallingly embarrassing because you have people, and I'll just be playing in a Democrat party who have such disdain for our country, They'll abandon the entire party process. You'll, like for example, Tim Wal is talking about, we need every vote to count in every state, but you'll be on the ticket with a candidate for the presidency that didn't get one vote in Democratic primary. Not one. Because when you deal with regressivism, the agenda is always the objective. They don't care about process, constitutes fidelity, none of the stuff matters. The agenda is what matters. That's how I won't go into too far into that. but I'm looking at this and as I've described to you before, anybody who would say to you, they were surprised by Joe Biden's mental decline, they're lying. I'm talking about the people who are around him. They're not telling the truth. Because listeners of this program, we've been telling you this for years. You can just watch later Joe Biden versus earlier Joe Biden, you can see there's a decline going on there. And so then you have the debacle on June 27th and then all of the same people who is telling you, He's right his reign fit is a fiddle they go. I can't believe it Do you believe it Jeff McIntosh? Can you believe it not the computer with a little apple signal but the produce of the program? The man has gone crazy Can you believe it mr. Rosa? We had no idea like man you guys are lying and then and then you want to talk about an empty suit then you put up and And this is why they haven't allowed her to do interviews and things of that make nature to this point because they know Hey, they know that's why when she ran for president in 2019 none of the Democrats wanted her That's why until she got the sir pro rinse job That the Democrats are saying man is the worst vice president ever That's what they were saying and then all of a sudden It made me think that these people have such a disdain for the country that they're willing to even do that if it will allow them to hold on to what they perceive as power, which brings me to the word of God. Because when you have that kind of those kind of things transpire publicly before our very eyes, it's vitally important that we are able to discern spiritually what's happening. What is happening by and large in our country brothers and sisters is that popular electoral candidacies are reflecting the core of our nation, not every single person.

  4. 6:53

    And I know the overwhelming majority of this audience is a part of the remnant, but we cannot put our heads in the sand as to what's happening in our country. Like when you think about I was just reading a report today that you have 10 states that are pursuing state abortion measures where the murder merchants have generated 10 times more revenue than the people that are fighting for life in the various states. times, how is that possible? Because you have at a minimum, people that are far willing to invest money for, I'm going to call it what it is, demonic molec worship. Then we have people that are willing to fight for life because the molec worship is connected to sexual immorality. We call it what you want. You can talk about the red herrings. You can talk about the acceptance as if they are the rule, but the bottom line is that is what's happening. That's what's And it made me, the Lord brought this scripture to mind. Isaiah chapter two, verses seven and eight. Isaiah is appealing to Judah who is rebelling and a rebellion against the Lord. And this is one of the things that God said to Judah through his prophet, Isaiah chapter two, verse seven. Their land has been filled with silver and gold. And there is no end to their treasures. The land also has been filled with horses. There is no end to their chariots. The land has also been filled with idols. They worship the work of their hands. That which their fingers have made. Rebellion is real, but the Bible diagnosis is a particular type of rebellion that takes place within a context of material prosperity.

  5. 8:55

    And oftentimes, the people who are in rebellion will insulate themselves against the conviction of the Lord with their prevalent material prosperity. They won't say it, but they'll think it. And surely we can't be that bad because look at all of this, how we got going on. It happens often, you know, with people who are entrepreneurial, they're very driven, They're very business minded and they so focused on focusing on, you know, getting that money, getting that dough, making this happen, making these shakes, signing this deal, getting this agreement that they're willing to allow their spiritual life to drift, you know. So content, not everybody. This is not, I'm not, I don't want to paint with a broad brush, but I've seen it enough times that this is sometimes the pattern that it takes to become so focused on the hustle, if you will, that the spiritual exercise and the sharp edge of the sermon and the consistency of commitment to the Lord, it can be allowed to drift. The next thing you know, the convictions are reduced. And then you're engaging in environments where in the past it would bother you, wouldn't do it before. And then next thing you know, you're watching certain things and listening to certain things and having audience fraternity with guys who you wouldn't have when you were sharp. And then the drift is continuous but imperceptible. And it takes an external phenomenon to snap you back into reality. This is one of the things that the Lord was confronting through Isaiah. Your land is filled with silver and gold. Yeah? Where's your heart? Your land is filled with treasures. Yes. Where are your hearts? The land is filled with horses. At that time, you know, the prevalence of horses was an indication of wealth.

  6. 11:01

    And we have odd manner of innovation here. You know, America with the largest GDP in the world, the larger percentage of a population with disposable income. Obviously not everybody, but generally speaking. There is no end to that chariots. Chariots were indicative of military superiority and innovations, almost like an old school forerunner of a tank. And then we'll look at the Lord's side. They land has also been filled with idols. Mm-hmm. And Mr. Vol. of this. The land is filled with idols. The people moved away from God, began to worship things that they've created. Man, look at this business. Ooh, ooh. Look at my portfolio. Ooh, look at my family. Look at my home. And my parents couldn't imagine living like this. Ooh, look, we have this going on. Ooh, we have this going on. We have all of these things going on, not even able to discern how far we drifted from the Lord. Here you have, and I don't mean this to be an intentional insult, but Kamala Harris is vacuous. What I mean by that, she is a non-substantive, unserious person. She's an unserious person. When you are asked substantive questions, and your answer is, well, I grew up in a middle-class family. You're not fooling anybody. That is a social filibuster. Yet, yet there are potent forces pushing for her to have the nuclear codes who refuse to acknowledge the irony that, ma'am, you are in office now. I had any, I mean, get to it. I had Jeff prepare the graphic on her, you know, opportunity agenda, you know, for more melanated men, for black men. The immediate question everybody should be asking is if you so hot to try it on this policy agenda, how come you ain't doing it now?

  7. 13:09

    Why don't you do, how are you gonna advertise yourself as a page turner, we're turning the page, turning the page, moving fast to form a generation when you're in office now? And then have the audacity, if people wanna ask you questions about it, to wax with another word salad. We'll follow the law. And we have this, and I don't want us to limit our perception as to what's happening based on mere partisan analysis. We have to have the integrity and the honesty to zoom out, Look at what the word of God says, and then look at what's happening in our country. You wanna talk about a constitutional crisis, guys, we're in a spiritual crisis in our nation. And I think it's vitally important to show up, you know, if you're an early voted, whatever you wanna do, November 5th, but you know what I'm praying about, and I'm gonna talk more about this because I wanna invite you to join me in the time of fasting and praying, but I'm thinking about the day after. Who are we gonna be on November 6th? If the Lord allows President Trump be not only the 45th president but the 47th president of the United States, what's going to happen? Well we see that as an occasion to be like, well all is right in the world or but we recognize, oh God has given us room to breathe, let us take advantage of this time that we have. Because if you're not noticing there's drifting happening whacked out wise on the Democrat side but also whacked out wise on the Republican side. Those who place their faith in Jesus are elevated to an extraordinary position. As co-heirs with Christ, we share in His inheritance. The gospel is the ultimate dignity giver, elevating the unworthy to unimaginable heights.

  8. 15:14

    Our lives should reflect this dignity, empowering us to extend the same grace and love to others that has been so generously given to us. I'm Jordan Shambly, and you can read the rest of the gospel dignified by the Un-Dignified on TheStand.net. Shining light into the darkness, this is the Hamilton Corner, an American family radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton, the third here. I don't wanna be clear about something I just said, in no way am I attempting to insinuate that there is more equivalence between Democrat Party and the Republican Party. It ain't even close. What I'm saying is that we should not be ignorant in recognizing what's happening as our entire culture is moving in the same trajectory. But as it stands two days as it stands, there is no way. I mean, you got the baby murder of zealots, you have the sexual rebellion advocates, not just zealots, but advocates for it, even with the ad not only baby murder, but the mutilation and the chemical castration in a whole bit of children. Children, you have the willingness to forcibly confiscate your neighbor's wealth in the name of government programs. I mean, there's no end to it. And so they're not morally equivalent. And I'm saying this biblically, when you align them, you can look at the platforms of both parties currently. And I know there have been some significant changes on the Republican side, but it is undeniable when you evaluate them both biblically that they are not morally equivalent. So I don't want anybody to misconstrue what I'm saying on that point. But we have to be discerning.

  9. 17:14

    And when I'm talking about what are we going to do on August 6, I mean November 6, regardless of how it ends up. And there I go again assuming that we're going to have a total's tallied on November 5. They are already sending out warnings. Hey, don't expect the votes to be counted on November 5. I mean, remember those good old days, right? What I'm saying is after the election, what are we gonna do? Where will we be? How are we going to respond? Pray? Yes. And obey. And obey. Put feet to our commitment. Put it to practice. What God is requiring of us. All right. That's another good point. Pamela says, and don't forget about the rhinos in the Republican party. Well, of course, can't I forget that, Pamela? To this debacle last night, And there are lots of ways you can take this. There were salacious things that happened. But frankly, I'm not interested in the salacious stuff. I want out. And I want to be as objective as I can, but frankly, Brett Bearer's interview with Kamala Harris yesterday just confirms why her handlers don't want her doing these interviews. That she does not perform well when she has to answer substantive questions. And when the questioner would not accept her word salad, filibuster answers as replies, he just does not. It was obvious that she was expecting a contentious interview because she came in very defensive. You could tell when she had her opening salvo, prepared talking points versus her response as the question as the interview went on, it was obvious as the transition took place.

  10. 19:16

    But even with the prepared opening salvo's, there were still patented efforts to avoid substantive answers to the questions that were legitimate, not because of the questionnaire. See, what people have to realize when you do these interviews, the whole purpose of the interview is to make an appeal to the American people, not to the person asking you to question. You know, so, and I know how it goes, the people that are already in the tank for for for for Kamala Harris, they're gonna come away saying it's the best interview ever, you know, you know, and then people that are opposed to camel hair, so they're going to say it was the most most horrible interview ever ever, but I'm trying to be very objective. And I'm going to have examples what I'm talking about the way there were substantive questions, asked questions that the American people are interested in questions that I know people are interested in here in the answers to because they asked me these same questions. And so I'm going to start at the very beginning of the interview as expected. Brett Bear came right off the top, about asking her about immigration. And rightfully so because the majority of American people even polls indicate that immigration is one of the top line issues that people are concerned about in this election. So when asked, and I'm gonna start with clip number four, I'm gonna start with clip number four, Bret Baer begins the interview by asking her, the current occupant of the vice president's mansion, if she knows exactly how many illegal aliens coming to our country during her administration is clip number four, listen to and watch clip number four, go. How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your administration has released into the country over the last three and a half years? Well, I'm glad you raised the issue of immigration because I agree with you. It is a topic of discussion that people want to rightly have. You know what I'm going to talk about. Yeah, but do you just a number? Do you think it's 1 million, 3 million? Brett, let's just get to the point. Okay, the point is that we have a broken immigration system that needs to be repaired.

  11. 21:21

    So your Homeland Security Secretary said that 85% of apprehensions- Well, I'm not finished. I'm not finished. We have a- We have a- So, wrong estimate of 6 million people have been released into the country. And let me just finish, I'll get to the question, I promise you. Okay, stop today. I'm gonna pick up from right there with the next clip. But here's something everybody needs to understand. All right, just because someone offers a response, it doesn't mean that that's an answer to the question. I've explained before in courts of law, when attorneys are asking questions, witnesses under oath, whether you're examining them on direct examination or cross-examination, when you ask a question, let's say for example, I'm cross-examining a witness, and I ask a question, and the witness provides a response, but the response does not answer the question that I asked. Here, Bret Baer asked, How many illegal aliens have entered the country during administration? That's a very clear question, right? What is the question asking for? A number, right? Now I get that she doesn't want to give a number. I get that. I get that. But he asked her for a number. She proceeds to provide a response, but she does not include a number. You know, if she was on a witness stand and we were in a court of law, I would stand up, Objection you're on a non-responsive. The judge knows when I object non-responsive, what I'm saying is that I asked a question, she is providing an answer with words, sorry, she's providing a response with words, but her response is not addressing my question. No objection, non-responsive. That's what would happen in the court of law. Here, Bret Baer asked a question. She offered a response that is non-responsive to the question he asked, and then becomes upset and defensive that he wants to get her to answer the question asked. That is literally what happened. And she took it as, oh, you're interrupting me while I'm answering. It's a very simple question. Now you can provide a response, then an explanation for, you can provide an answer, then an explanation for your answer, but he's asking for a specific number or an estimated number.

  12. 23:29

    But what he's asking for is a number. He's not asking for croutons and romaine lettuce in tomatoes and cucumbers, verbally of course, otherwise known as word salad. So the interview continues, and it's clear, right from the beginning, she does not want to answer the question. She doesn't want to answer the question. So he presses further to try to say, hey, let's have this conversation about immigration, not just the meandering word salads. Let's have a real substantive conversation about this issue. Listen to and watch clip number two, go. I was beginning to answer. And when you came into office, your administration immediately reversed a number of Trump border policies. Most significantly the policy that required illegal immigrants to be detained through deportation, either in the U.S. or in Mexico, and you switched that policy. They were released from custody awaiting trial. So instead included in those were a large number of single men, adult men, who went on to commit heinous crimes. So looking back, do you regret the decision to terminate remain in Mexico at the beginning of your administration? At the beginning of our administration, within practically hours of taking the oath, the first bill that we offered Congress before we worked on infrastructure, before the inflation reduction Act before the Chips and Science Act, before the Bipartisan Safety Communities Act. The first bill, practically within hours of taking the oath, was a bill to fix our immigration system. Yes, ma'am. It was called the US Citizenship Act of 2021. It was essentially halfway to sit down. This is where I get really annoyed with her and people like her, because this is where, once again, the disdain for the American people comes to the fore, and oh, I see our earrings.

  13. 25:37

    People are allowed to come to know those earrings though, I see those earrings. The earrings ain't helping in this interview. So, Bret Baer continues to press his question about immigration and gets even more specific. You guys, among the 94 approaching 100 executive orders that you reversed day one, you also rescinded the Trump administration's remain in Mexico policy that particularly applied to those who are seeking asylum. Like you want asylum, you have to apply for it before you get to our border. You can't just run up in my house and ask me if you got room. You have to give me a chance to see if I have room before you come to my house. They rescinded that. And so then she immediately pivots and she might have done this in other contexts before. I'm sure she might have done it in some speeches, but I've never heard her do it in an interview where she now for the first time, in her candidacy in response to a question about illegal immigration, She presents the US Citizenship Act of 2021. And again, this is where I get irate. For several reasons, first and foremost, she wants to present the lack of the US Citizenship Act passing in 2021 as if, oh, that's the reason why we have a problem at the border. What she doesn't tell you is that the Democrats had the House of Representatives, had the majority of the House of Representatives in 2021, when this measure was proposed. The Democrats had a majority in the US Senate in 2021, when this measure was proposed. And oh, guess what? They also had the White House. So you're gonna bring up this bill as if it's the reason why I had to border all of a sudden, magically had people pouring over. When just weeks ago, when Trump's policies were in position, we didn't have illegal immigrants pouring over our border. And the reason I'm saying it shows disdain for the American people, because it is frankly a flat lie. So you're trying to say that it's President Trump's fault and the Republicans that the Democrat didn't get a bill passed when they had all of the authority concerning what legislation comes to the floor, then beyond that.

  14. 27:52

    Beyond that, do you know what the US Citizenship Act of 2021 was? Guys, it was an amnesty bill. It was an amnesty bill that was so bad even the Democrats realized, oh, we shouldn't do this right now. We shouldn't do this right now. But she throws this out because she expects the American people to refuse to go and look up what she's talking about. They don't even take a whole lot of time. While you're watching the interview, you can do a quick interweb search, doo doo doo doo, you have citizens, your back to 2021, you can pull up the legislation from Congress's website and you can read the bill for yourself. That's not a bill that was stemmed the flow of illegal immigrants in the country. That's actually a bill that when you pair it with the rescission of the Trump administration's executive actions, it's a bill that not only facilitates illegal immigration, but you instantly make all the illegal immigrant citizens. You instantly make, not citizens, you instantly make all of the illegal immigrants legal. That's what that bill was. So for you to present that as if, well, hey, we presented a bill within hours after taking the oath of office. Yeah, you presented a bill to do what you are ultimately wanted to do by having our borders over run with illegal aliens. And the reason why I'm pointing this out, not just about the, you know, the highbrow clickbait, you know, viral videos, but to have a substantive conversation. This is a slap in the face rhetorically. You think the American people are so stupid that that's your answer? The premise of the question is our nation has been overrun with illegal immigrants since you've taken office. Your response by that answer is, yeah, we wouldn't have the problem if we just make them all legal, what you saying?

  15. 29:52

    And it just shows that this day, and that these people have, for the hard working everyday American citizen, they wanna work us to death, they wanna tax us to death, they wanna force us to undergird all of their fanciful spending whims. And then say shut up and take it because we know what's best for you. We don't care what you think about Ukraine. We gonna take your money and send it to Ukraine because it's best for you. We don't care if you care about your border. We don't care about your border. So we're gonna take your money and then let all these illegal aliens into our country. No, your country, shut up and take it. It's crazy. And I know it's short, I'll run one more clip for you because Brett Bear set up the next portion of his question by naming young women who've been murdered by illegal immigrants, Jocelyn and Gary, Rachel Moran, Laken Riley. And after all of those things happened, those murders occurred, came on, I actually have I saw Dasky did say, yeah, the border's secure. Brad Baer had a salient question for you. You said it was secure then. When did it become a border crisis in your mind? Listen to him and watch clip three. Go. During that time you said repeatedly that the border was secure. When in your mind did it start becoming a crisis? I think we've had a broken immigration system transcending, by the way, Donald Trump's administration even before. Let's all be honest about that. I have no pride in saying that this is a perfect immigration system. been clear I think we all are. Again somebody got the red rubber ball out because she's playing dodgeball. She said the border was secure even after these young women were murdered. Then she flipped and all of a sudden the border is a problem. Brett Baer's question was when did you conclude that the border was in crisis? When did you come to that conclusion? She... Immigration has always been a problem. No ma'am. We didn't have 10, 12, 20 million illegal aliens coming into the country where Mr. Trump was in office. That happened under your watch. So now that you care about the border, Brett Baer's question is one the American people will want asked. When did you recognize it was a crisis? The following is from an article by Dr. Jessica Peck, host of the Dr. Nurse Momma Show.

  16. 32:34

    Some children feel fear in places they should feel safe every day. So let's be challenged to speak words of life and encouragement. The next time a student shares a discouragement or difficulty with you, try listening first and then engaging them in compassionate and encouraging conversation. Read the full article School Mom Hope on thestand.net. just having a legitimate conversation about this, you know? And I did, I did, I do wanna give Kamala Harris credit and what appeared to be at a, for a moment, for a moment, I felt like she expressed empathy towards the families of these young women who'd been murdered, but it was like just a glimpse, just a glimpse of a moment. And it's almost like, I can't do that, can't show any empathy because then it could damage my electoral prospects. And it's just, and I'm not saying that was so calculus, but what I did perceive was a moment to where it seemed to be some empathy toward the Nungare family, the Morin and the Riley family, but then it was like a half a second and right back to, you know, what I got my script that I have to follow. And it's just, it's just wicked, man. Brett Baer got to the point in the interview where he asked, in 2019, and this was a part of a litany of questions, or several questions, maybe like one or two, maybe even a third, where he was basically presenting, that she had such a radical departure from a position she's held all the way up through her presidential run in 2019.

  17. 34:38

    Now all of a sudden she's changing all of these positions, and even said, like, you supported allowing illegal immigrants into the country, that, and when they got here, they could get driver's licenses, and free tuition universities and getting enrolled in free health care and all of these things and said, do you support these things? Of course, she said, no, last night. And then he said, well, why did you nominate Tim Walts to be a running mate? Because he signed all of these things into law at the state level of Minnesota. Every single thing I just mentioned, drivers like licenses, really, go aliens tuition at state universities, free tuition for illegal aliens, enrolling illegal aliens in a free health care. Tim Walts supports all of those things. So how can you on one hand say, you don't support this when you nominate a person who literally not just supported, sign those things into law. Of course, no, no, no answers. No answers. And several times she was just stunned. I'm going to show you one of those moments in a moment, it won't be this next clip of the one after that. Bret Baird, and this is my opinion was a softball. He brought up, you showed up on the view when asked because you keep saying turn in the page. We're going to turn the page. You showed up on the view when asked, okay, you want us to turn the page. But what would be different about your president from a by presidency from a Biden presidency? You literally said nothing. Nothing comes to mind. Nothing. Nothing. I'm coming to the studio. Hey, Bobby, we have a brand new show. Bobby says, Hey, what's going to be different about the new show from the old show? Nothing, Bobby. So his Bobby goes, uh, you sure it's a new show? He said, then again, you had another appearance when you were asked the exact same question. You literally said nothing and he asked her that as well.

  18. 36:40

    Look at this guys. Clip number five. Go. It's interesting you said turn the page, man, advice present. You were asked on two different shows last week, what if anything you would do differently than President Biden? Here would you said? Would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years? There is not a thing that comes to mind in terms of, and I've been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact. Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be, and what would stay the same? Sure. Well, I mean, I'm obviously not Joe Biden. I know. And so that would be one change in terms of... But also, I think it's important to say with, you know, 28 days ago, I'm not Donald Trump. So you're not Joe Biden, you're not Donald Trump, but nothing comes to mind that you would do differently. Let me be very clear. My presidency will not be a continuation of Joe Biden's presidency. And like every new president that comes in to office, I will bring my life experiences, my professional experiences, and fresh and new ideas. I represent a new generation of leadership. For example, I'm someone who has not spent the majority of my career in Washington, DC. Ma'am, and like, this is what I'm talking, and guys, and I'm showing this to you, I'm sharing this with you for the substantive assessment for the lack thereof. So the first time on the view, she goes, nothing comes to mind. She gets a rerun on the co-bhercher. This dude is a comedian. This is not some hard-hitting journalistic outfit. She goes, well, I'm not Joe Biden and I'm not down to Trump. Man, you know the question that is being presented to you is asking what substantively policy-wise censure saying your presidency wouldn't be a continuation of the Joe Biden presidency. The obvious question is how would it be different?

  19. 38:43

    She says, well, obviously I'm not Joe Biden. She says that like, oh, yeah, you should take that one to the bank. This obvious that the question is asking you for a substantively policy wise would be different. Where do you and Joe Biden part ways? How will your presidency be different? You know what the real truth is? It won't be. And she can't admit that because she literally goes from saying, I'm not Joe Biden and I'm not Donald Trump. Then she goes on to say, and I haven't spent most of my career in Washington DC, guess who else hadn't? Trump! Trump has not. So my point in presenting this to you is simply to show when I say she's vacuous, this is what I'm saying. You at home, listen to me right now, and you are asked, how would your presidency be different than the incumbent in the office currently? You would probably be able to give me at least five or six things right off the top of your head without any preparation. But this woman has all the handlers, the debate prep, the cute earrings. Heh heh heh heh heh heh. And she's still, she still cannot say how she, it would be different. And this is what I'm talking about, saying vacuous substance less. This is what I'm saying. I give you another one. Man, I gotta hurry up. This seemed to really catch her off guard. She was going on a roll talking about, you know, basically it was orange man bad. That was her screets she was going on. Then Brett Bear hit it with a slider. And by the way, since we're talking about mental stability, when did you first, I mean, I mean, because you were hot to trot saying Joe Biden is, he's tough, he's strong, he's mighty. When did you first notice his mental faculties appeared diminished? Watch her pause in reaction. I mean, those earrings didn't help her at all. Clip number six, go. Let me ask you this.

  20. 40:44

    You told many interviewers that Joe Biden was on his game that ran around circles on his staff. When did you first notice that President Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished? Joe Biden, I have watched from the Oval Office to the situation room. And he has the judgment and the experience to do exactly what he has done in making very important decisions on behalf of the American people. Joe Biden is not on ballot. I understand. But Donald Trump is. But you talked about it. And Donald Trump is. And if you watch Donald Trump. And if you watch Donald Trump. And if you watch Donald Trump. But I've met a fundraiser that he thought this was not the same Joe Biden that we saw on the debate stage is on the Bound I understand you met with him at least once a week for three and a half years. You didn't have any concerns I Think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump again Substantive concerned ma'am the question is not who's on the ballot the question is your judgment and your integrity in office See this is one of the things and and I would have followed up with this Brett beard didn't follow with this Do you realize that the 25th Amendment gives the Vice President solely the prerogative to invoke it? Soly. So the question is a legitimate question. You felt like he was so, you were so willing to recognize his mental debilitation that you were willing to step in to campaign for the presidency. When did you first recognize he was diminishing? Because a couple of days before you become the candidate, you were saying he was right his reign. The question literally goes to your competence. It goes to your integrity in office, your willingness to exalt constitution over personality over party. But of course, I think she knows that and then want to step into that field back to the word salad. These are substantive issues that are worthy of conversing.

  21. 42:45

    And since we're talking about the Harris by administration, this next story really, really bother me. I'm transitioning quickly because we're running out of time. Beverly Lynn Beatty Williams. This is a woman who had a tortured life. She had her first of several abortions at 15 years old, the Lord radically saved her according to her own testimony. And she became a pro-life activist. She protested abortion around the country numerous places. One protest in particular in a murder mill in New York led to her to be arrested and charged with violation of the Face Act. She ultimately went to trial and was sentenced yesterday. I'm sorry, sentenced following the trial. She turned herself in yesterday to three and a half years in prison, 41 months in prison, plus an additional two years of probation or supervised release. I want you to listen to a little bit of her talking about her sentencing, clip number eight, go. You know, I'll be honest, I wasn't expecting the judge to rule on the time that prosecution was requesting. I just didn't expect, you know, you expect a judge to just want to do what's right. What they, you know, they see criminals daily, lawyers and judges see criminals. They know a criminal when they see one. I wanted the judge to do the right thing. And I just walked out of there, just heartbroken. I was heartbroken and devastated. And I mean, you know, this I called your wife crying. I just, I was so hurt. And it just, it was so surreal. Like I was hot and cold at the same time. I just couldn't believe 41 months, plus two years of supervised release. It just was like, oh my, this is overwhelming. But, you know, they made it very clear.

  22. 44:45

    You know, a lot of people, thousands of people watched you stand in front of that abortion clinic and make the stance that you made. And, you know, before they get inspired by what you did, we're gonna give you a serious sentence. We're gonna make a statement and they were not secretive about it. They made that very clear in court And so it was devastating The nation was just it was just devastating The Harris by administration has made it their priority while the Manhattan County is Letting out violent criminals the Biden Harris administration has made it a point to prosecute people who are pro-life Bevelin Beatty was prosecuted under the face act which prohibits I'll just read the statute prohibits by force of threat or by physical obstruction intentionally, intimidating or interfering with or attempting to injure or intimidate or interfere with any person because that person is or has been or in order to intimidate this person or any other person of any class of persons from obtaining or providing reproductive health services. It's the bottom line. What Beverly, Beverly and Beatty was accused of and tried for and ultimately convicted of is that she prohibited, first of all, employees from the abortion clinic from entering the abortion clinic. And then later when they had moms who were coming to abort their babies, she diverted, she by obstructing the front door forced them to enter the staff entrance. All right? First of all, I believe the Face Act is an unconscionable unconstitutional law. That's one issue. But what I want to focus on right now is the sentencing. What Bev and the baby was accused of basically was a trespass and they elevated it to a felony because it happened to be an unabortion clinic, a murder mill. And because the Harris Biden administration is so committed to murdering children, they want to make an example out of this mom who has a two-year-old of her own and the husband of her own and say, no, we're going to send you to prison.

  23. 46:49

    Now, I can tell you as a prosecutor, we don't send what's commonly described as non-violent offenders to prison for non-violent offenses. This past is a misdemeanor. Generally speaking, but no, they want to make an example out of her. Remember what I told you Wednesday? Or when Trey Delinger was here and we talked about the Harris Biden administration's intentional intervention in the Tennessee case to force children to be able to be mutilated and to be sterilized. And here you see the commitment to Molek is so profound that they'll send this woman to prison. We are facing in their attempting to appeal. Her legal team are doing all of those things. But what we are facing, and I'm not gonna run out of time, I had a clip of her husband talking about this as he was dropping her off at the federal prison. It's too long, I don't have time for it. But this is what we're talking about. These are the priorities. These are governmental priorities. Lock up a mom herself, who because of her own trauma suffered from her own abortions, she was attempting to warn other moms to not do what she had done. And to share with them the love of Jesus Christ that she had found that led her to have a complete reversal of her fortunes, where she now is a wife and a mother herself as a Christ follower. Yet we have regressive investments in this country that are so vile that they're committed to putting her in prison. Not just convicting her of a trust pass, but putting her in prison. That's evil. That is evil. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.

Subscribe and never miss an episode.

Pick your platform All Episodes
Latest episode Book Abe