Weeknights 5 PM CT
on AFR

Oct 28, 2024 · 50 minutes

Now We Know Why People Have Lost Confidence in Formerly Trusted Institutions

Play episode50:00. Keeps playing while you browse.

Taller bars mean faster talk at that point in the show. Tap any line of the transcript to play from there.

The Hamilton Corner logo above Abraham Hamilton, III on the show's set

Show notes

0:00 - 15:00. 2 Timothy 3:10-17. God’s word is a necessity. It fortifies Christ-followers against deception. 15:00 - 31:00. Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy exemplifies why people have lost confidence in formerly trusted institutions. 31:00 - 48:00. RFK, Jr. reveals an area where President Trump is breaking from tradition.

Share this episode

Transcript

6,675 words, in two-minute parts. Made by machine, so a few words may be off.

0:0050:00

  1. 0:01

    Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite. Delivery people out of the bondage of mainstream media. And the philosophies of this world. God has called you and me to be his ambassador. Even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. And now, the Hamilton Corner. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner here on American Family Radio. I'm your host, Abraham Hamilton, III. Joined by the corner contingent right across from me, my man, 100 grand, Mr. Bobby. Ha-ra-ra-ra-ra-ra-ra-Letza, and in the screening room I see Richie Rich I don't see Mr. Sparks at the moment but I know he's in the building Mr. Marty Sparks will be joining Richie Rich soon enough as we kick off this new week, uh brand new week of broadcasting, new day, new mercies from the Lord for which I am grateful. Uh but to remind you we are still uh fasting until November I know Election Day is November 5th, but November 6 is the day after the Election Day. It's just one of the things that the Lord is impressing upon me, that I want to invite you to join me in, is what will we be about the day after the election? What will we be about? We have to understand that in the framework of our national establishment, God by His grace has allowed us the space to follow him.

  2. 2:01

    And what will we do? What will we do with the opportunity that God has given us? At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part-time jobs where you generate an income to your full-time jobs, where you cultivate an outcome. As you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality, understanding the primacy that God places on family and the privilege we get to operate within his economy. The first human institution that God established was the family. Before an order of priests, modern iterations of civil government, the first human institution was the family. The first command that God gave to mankind was within the familial context. I am highlighting this not to denigrate any other context or any other stations of life that we may be in, but simply to underscore the reality of what God has done and to communicate the necessity of us having a proper view of the family. Regardless of where we are, we should all be able to say amen to the fact that it is important that we build our society according to God's dictates. I'm not talking about some theocratic reign as if you're going to have priests, you know, like it is in Iran, you know, the Ayatollahs run Iran. I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about living in liberty, which implies a liberty to function according to God's design, as opposed to in rebellion against God's design. According to God's design, we are in a place in and our nation, man, we are in a place where deception is abundant.

  3. 4:12

    And we must utilize the resources that God has made available to us to be His hands and feet. To that point, let us turn to the Word of God. A portion of scripture we've visited before, but it's worth visiting again because the Word of God gives us the wherewithal to develop discernment discernment discernment. The more I interact with people just day to day going here going there. It's evident that we need discernment. Second Timothy chapter three versus 10 through 17 is what I'm going to go today. Second Timothy chapter three versus 10 through 17. Because there is a hubris and an arrogance that is flanking the deception. A boldness there I say. And we're gonna talk about that today. But I wanna start in the word of God. The Apostle Paul is speaking here. And he says this, writing to Timothy, now you followed my teaching, my conduct, purpose, faith, patience. love, perseverance, persecutions and sufferings such as happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra. What persecutions I endured and out of them all, the Lord rescued me. Indeed all who desire to live God in Christ Jesus will be persecuted. But evil men and imposters will proceed from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. you however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

  4. 6:25

    All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, or training and righteousness so that the man of God would be adequate, equipped for every good work. Right at the beginning, and actually in the beginning of this chapter, Paul talks about difficult times coming. As many of you know, you follow me for a while. This epistle to Timothy is written from Nero's prison shortly before Paul is executed under Nero's authority. And he's writing to Timothy and he says, you have followed my teaching, my conduct, my purpose, My faith, patience, love, and perseverance, you followed my persecutions and sufferings. You've heard me describe this before. Paul is identifying what I've described as the speech and feet phenomenon. Paul doesn't say, Timothy, you know what I've taught. You've heard me expound. You've heard me be didactic in presentation. No, he said, you've heard my teaching and you've seen how I've lived. You've heard what I've said, you've heard what I've taught others and you've been up close and you've seen how I have lived. so much of the call to be a witness is not merely faceted or fixed upon what we display, what we present, what we present must be confirmed by what we live. So much of the Christian witness is undermined, not by what is said, by what is lived, but by what is lived. In Galatius chapter two, Paul talked about his time of confronting Peter to his face at Antioch and Syria, not because Peter did not teach properly, No, Paul said his conduct was not in step with the gospel. So I had to confront him publicly. Brothers and sisters, it's important, it's high time that we understand the speech and feet must match. We got to live what we believe, man.

  5. 8:25

    We got to live what we say. Then Paul goes on to explain, you not only familiar with my speech, my teaching, my conduct, you know my purpose, you know my aim, you know my faith, but you also know my persecutions. You know what I suffered in Poseidon Antioch. You know what I suffered in Iconium. You know what I suffered in Leisture Paul makes that particular reference to Timothy because Timothy is from that region. All right, you can cross reference this. When Acts, chapters 14 and 16, you'll find that Timothy met Paul in those regions. And that's just one of the instances where Paul was stoned. And the people thought he was dead. And then Paul, eyes popped up, you got it, walked right back in town. That's from the area where Timothy is from. And then he lets Timothy, no, by the way, anybody who desires to live godly, signs still deliver the joys, you will face persecution. So many people in our context, and by God's grace, man, we've enjoyed so much freedom, so much abundance, so much prosperity in our nation, that the concept of persecution is foreign to us. But make no mistake about it, that is an exception in the duration of the Lord's bride. The question is not whether or not we will face persecution. question is how, what type of what quality of what intensity, you know, right now a lot of people don't even want to, they only want, won't even post a tweet in the name of the Lord. They're going that out like me. And I'm not saying social media is the end all be all. I'm just saying that's just an example, but this is where I want to go. Paul then says, but know this, know this, know this, evil men and imposters or some translations is render it seducers, will proceed from bad to worse, from bad to worse. These are things that will happen. We will face persecution. We will live in a time where evil men will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.

  6. 10:32

    Guys, I want you to understand clearly, a lot of the deception that's happening in our culture currently, it's happening, it is being propounded by people who are literally deceived themselves. They misconstrue sincerity with veracity. They misconstrue sincerity with truth. Just because you believe something sincerely doesn't make it true. You can be passionate. You can be passionate. You can be fervent. You can be sincere. And you can be passionately, fervently, and sincerely wrong. Your emotion doesn't make your position valid. You know, Thomas Sowell said, it's not that Johnny can't think, is that Johnny can confuse his thinking with feeling. Paul doesn't convey the notion that deception would abound in these latter perilous times. He then says this, but you, however, Timothy, and God would say to the believer, you, however, continue in what you know to be true, continue in what you believe. Paul goes on to verse 16, all scriptures God breathed. What the Lord has conveyed to us through this is that the means to navigate to overcome, to not be seduced by, this prevalent deception is by tethering ourselves to the Word of God. The Word of God sharpens out discernment. Paul said in Romans 12, don't be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the tune of your mind so that you may be able to prove what is the good, perfect and acceptable will of God. What is the negative implication that if you do not say differently? If you are conformed to this world and you are not transformed by the Son of your mind, you will be unable to discern what God's will is. I've explained before, Charles Spurgeon's description of discernment is not merely distinguishing right from wrong but distinguishing right from almost right.

  7. 12:40

    Brothers and sisters, it is not optional for us to have a diet of the Lord's Word that We study his word that we cling to his word. Oh Lord, how I love your law is my meditation day and night. Wherein' may a young man keep his way pure. It is by taking heed according to your word. Your word, O Lord, is a light unto my feet and a lamp unto my path. We have people that are professing that they want to be able to navigate the times that we're in. Yet that Bible's a collecting dust. It is, what do you call a thing? What do women call it, Persis? Oh, an accessory. It's a Sunday go to meeting accessory for too many people in our country. We have too many people in our country that will spirit you. See lots of young cats talking about, yeah, we're looking for the woman. I want a spiritual woman. Where's your spiritual life, man? Well, we're going to set you up. Yeah, my business, eh? But the sisters, I want a godly man who's going to be ahead of my head, our family. Where's your spiritual life sister? And what's evident is that we have a plethora of our federal fellow citizens who have an who are allergic to the Lord's Word and appears. And how do I know? Because our society is so susceptible to deception. Paul identified that the time of deception would come. He then said, take heart and take heed for the word of God is Theo Nusitos. It is God breathed, it is inspired by God. And in this environment where deception is abundant, where deception is replete, God's Word is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training, in righteousness, training, in righteousness, instructed in righteousness. God's word is the means by which we can be fortified against deception, that in the midst of the chaos of deception in this context God has planted us in, he's made the way forward for us to be his hands and feet.

  8. 14:58

    Here's Dr. Michael Kruger from the American Family Studios documentary, The God Who Speaks. You know, heresy has a multifaceted dimension about it. It can develop from a number of different sources. It can have a number of different causes. It's simple as misunderstanding the passage of Scripture is so profoundly that one deviates from the faith. It could be driven by personal gain where someone wants to advocate a view that helps their own agenda. Heracy can derive from someone being deceived and tricked by an outside source or an outside teacher that convinces them something is true that isn't. And so, ultimately, we would argue that there is spiritual activity behind all those things. Satan is out to deceive and trick the church. And so he is always churning up debate and churning up disagreement about the person of Christ and the nature of the gospel and so on. Visit thegodwhospeaks.org. Shiting light into the darkness, this is the Hamilton Corner, an American family radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton, III. I will continue to espouse the necessity of studying the Lord's War. And I always encourage this, you know, as we're fasting, it's not merely dieting, you know, and again, I'm not trying to condemn anybody, but I want to encourage you to endeavor when you are foregoing meals of various sorts that you replace that with feasting on the meal of the word of God. And it's been time in prayer. And we must have resolved for what we will do following this election. Now we're talking about deception and I want to revisit this.

  9. 17:00

    I just like this, this story has grabbed me and I cannot shake the story itself, but also the implications for it in our society and why there is, there has not been in my view sufficient pushback against this type of wickedness. This is not hyperbolic. This is straight up evil. straight up, straight up, straight up evil. So I began this conversation last week, Thursday about this story, about this physician at, and I think I referred to it as the UCLA Children's Gender Clinic, but it's actually the Children's Hospital in Los Angeles. I'm pretty sure it's connected, but it's technically the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles. And the director, the medical director of the Center for trans youth health and development is a woman. She's a doctor by the name of Dr. Johanna Olson Kennedy. All right. Dr. Johanna Olson Kennedy as again, the director of the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles's gender clinic, one of if not the most prominent one in the country, applied to the National Institute of Health, NIH for a grant, applied for a grant for the express purposes of conducting a study concerning the impact of puberty blockers on dysphoric children. Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy was awarded a $9.7 million grant, nearly $10 million of American federal tax payer money to conduct this study.

  10. 19:07

    The study, guys, was conducted from 2015 to 2017. We're not talking about something that just happened. All right? This is a study that was conducted the same year Obergefell. The study began the same year the Obergefell decision was made. Now I want you to pause and think about that. And I've said this before in this program, I'm gonna say it again. I remember testifying against same-sex marriage in the Louisiana state legislature in the time period where the Louisiana legislature passed a bill to allow the citizens to amend the state constitution to define marriage as the exclusive union of one man and one woman, which is what happened. That is still on the books in Louisiana today. The thing that over turned that, if you will, was the 2015 Obergefell decision. And I remember testifying prior to that was that if you open the door and say this way, if you reject God's design for marriage, you are opening the door to everything else. I said that. I was looked at only this little boy pat on the head, pat, pat, pat, this fear monger. Oh, your slippery soap, soap arguments. Little did I know while I'm making this argument in Louisiana long before the 2015 Obergefell case. the Obergefell decision is being considered and ultimately is decided, Dr. Johanna Olson-Kinity was already considering a transgenderism. It shouldn't be lost on anyone here that the very day, the very day that the Supreme Court accepted Jack Phillips' case, in the Masterpiece Cakeshop's case, that the exact same day you had a lawyer trying to ensnare Jack Phillips on the basis of transgenderism. Less than ten years down the line. Guys, that shouldn't be lost on us now. I didn't know factually that when Obergefell is being decided that dr. Kennedy Olsen Kennedy was applying for taxpayer money to study the impact of transgenderism on children and puberty blockers on children, but she was But she was the study that she conducted a two-year study the researchers chose 95 children who had an average age of 11 years old y'all listen to me 11 years old, Dr. Johanna Olson Kennedy oversaw this study. The children, according to Dr. Olson Kennedy herself, presented with disparate conditions to where they were suffering from suicidal ideations and they were struggling with their reconciliation of their biology and their perception of their gender identity. This is what our words were.

  11. 22:11

    Admitted these children puberty blockers and monitored their development. The puberty blockers admit to delay the onset of bodily changes like the development of healthy breasts for girls and voice deepening for boys after following these children's progress for two years. Or should I say just following these children for two years documenting tediously what's happening, observing them. Johanna Olson Kennedy's thesis for the study and receiving the grant was, Well, we give them these puberty blockers, their mental health will improve. Do you know what happened? The exact opposite. Our very own study revealed that the children were worse off after receiving the puberty blockers. Their mental health was worse. Their psychological stability was worse. They were even more suicidal. Now the administration of the puberty blockers alone is evil in and of itself. They describe as puberty blockers. You're talking about the inhibiting of natural physical development that may never be reversed. In some instances, these things can chemically castrate children to where they never regain their reproductive capacity. That's even in of itself. But to compound that evil, Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy refused to publish the results of this study. Now we're learning about this now, guys. This dates back to 2015 through 2017.

  12. 24:15

    This woman had data, Dr. Johanna Olson Kennedy, had data that undermined her entire gender clinics function, but refused to release it to the public. And that's a study that she ain't paid for. The American taxpayer paid for that study. She's drawn criticism from some of her fellow researchers who share her ideology, but simply said that the public should not be denied this data. When questioned as to why she refused to release the data, she tried to him and her, she tried to, you know, fill the busting words out of her way out. And then she finally had to admit, well, I don't want our work to be weaponized against us. And then she flat out said that the study that I conducted could be used against us in court. So you know what that means, guys? Translation, I don't want to lose money. You said guilty, yes, guilty. And if I let this data out, I could be sued, because I've been practicing this stuff, even though I had the data in my own study that showed that it doesn't help. Contrary to her acknowledgement that the children were struggling before they came, she tried to explain it, wait, well no, actually what we realized is that the children were in really good shape when they came. That's why the puberty blockers didn't help. What? That's complete opposite of what she said because her own data recorded by the researchers on this study found that a quarter of the participants were depressed or suicidal before receiving these drugs.

  13. 26:33

    Now, I just want to talk about this concept because what happened to science, what happened to, and if you knew this, guys, this is 2024. She's been having this data since at a minimum 2017. Unsurprisingly, the socialized medicine in the UK, they've outlawed surgical mutilation and the chemical castration of children in the UK. We're talking about children. Many of the Nordic nations have outlawed this. I'm talking about children, guys, children. Yet this woman has data and research that shows, this is her own study. So she's selecting the participants. selecting the administration of the beauty blockers. She has her researches on the deal. And because the results of the study did not show what she wanted it to show, she refused to publish the data. She refused to publish the data. Remember when I was talking about deception in the last segment? Guys, this is an evil man and seduces will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. Dr. a clinical psychologist and a transgender youth expert, says she was quote, shocked and disturbed about the decision to withhold a publication of such vital research. We're craving information about these medical treatments for gender questioning youth. Dr. Olson Kennedy has the largest grant that's ever been awarded in the US on the subject and is sitting on the data that would be helpful to know.

  14. 28:35

    In quote, Dr. Anderson continued, it's not her prerogative to decide based on the results that she will or won't publish them. quote. Here's another quote. It's contrary to the scientific method. You do research and then you disclose what the results are. You don't change them. You don't distort them. You don't reveal or not reveal them based on the reactions of others. You report as scientists what you've learned. This is a real time example of what I'm talking about. Yes, she should be sued. Not only that, Sue and she'll be the beginning of it. How many children under her care have now suffer double mastectomies have had irreversible mutilations of their bodies. And then think about who are the people in our society advocating for this nonsense. Guys, this is wicked. This is wicked. You want to talk about the least of these? And we can go on all the other data that shows literally over 95% of the children who through their adolescence and through their developmental stages and through puberty and all. If you leave them alone, Don't give them no drugs, don't cut off no body parts. Overwhelming majority of these children end up perfectly fine. If you just leave them alone. But it's a special kind of wicked that you see this consistent effort to slaughter children and to mutilate children and to abuse children in the furtherance of adult agendas.

  15. 30:36

    And you're threatened, sometimes ignorant, although well-meaning parents to say, well, what would you rather to have your son who is identifying himself as a girl? You want to have, you know, a healthy daughter or a dead son. That's manipulation, man. And that's the line that I'm not just talking about, generally, Dr. Johanna Olson Kennedy is known for telling, dropping that line on parents. What do you think those parents would say, if they find out that this woman dropped that line on them, when she knows she has evidence, she has the largest study that's ever been funded in the United States of America for this very thing, and she's sitting on the data. Guys, this is evil. Evil. That's not a reasonable disagreement along the political spectrum. That is evil. You have data that contradicts your beliefs. Scientists are supposed to be a neutral pursuit of what is demonstrable, what is provable. But no, what you're finding out over and over and over again, these people are not only stacked to deck, they've not only weighted the scales, they funded the scales, and if the scales still don't come out the way they want it, They're gonna act like they never even knew it. It's no different than Deborah Burke's Scarf Lady coming out saying, well, we knew 10 days when flat in the curve, but that's what we had to do in order to deceive. And this is why I'm saying that we're standing at the fulcrum of a clash of worldviews, man. This is, that's just flat out evil. There's no euphemism to be employed there. This woman has a taxpayer funded study that contradicts her very own opinion. and not don't cheat because you can't refute her own study. But instead of attempting to offer any type of refutations, you just conceal the data. It's sickening to the core.

  16. 32:37

    And yet you have people wondering, well, why won't people just trust the science? Because we've learned and we're continuing to learn some of these people that are wearing white coats and carrying the better of scientists, and just high paid liars. A Hamilton Quarter podcast and one-minute commentaries are available at aFR.net. Back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. I mean, should I even bother with the reality that when you have publicly funded studies like this, that you have accountability mechanisms that require publication, you know? Why hasn't anybody looked into the enforcement mechanism to require publication of these types of studies? And part of the reason why I'm bringing attention to it, It's command that type of publication is to demand it, but this is absurd. This is absurd on the highest order. And it is worse than absurd. It's wicked. It's wicked. I remember one of the most challenging things as I was studying these things, long before I was ever on the radio, anything like that. I'm studying stuff like I'm learning about the Federal Reserve and my life can tell you, I would read and then I would have to just sit these books aside and I would just be quiet for like a day or two, and it was overwhelming to me to see tangible evidence of man's depravity. Like, you know, maybe I'm just too naive, but I thought people like this doctor cared about children enough to say, wait a minute, is this study indicating that I may be going on the wrong road with my practice?

  17. 34:45

    Well, of course not, you can't let anything get in the way of getting that money. And it's sickening guys. And then you have people that don't, or you're quack. You're conspiracy theories, you know, like, like, like, you're about to say, this, this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated, remember that? And you find, and it's not to throw shade on anybody, and everybody's trying to navigate things, but you had hospitals that had overwhelming data that a lot of the people that were suffering were various complications from schmovid where people were vaccinated. So why conceal that from the public? And you got the person with the highest office in our nation, with the bully pulpit of the presidency, literally being used to propound a narrative that is simply not true. Just simply not true. And the whole deal about Ivermectin, oh, it's horse deworming, all of these media sycophants, all in one line, the same ones just years ago who would talk about the Nobel laureates who won a Nobel Prize for the use of Ivermectin. While at the exact same time, our media, these are people who live and exist. Their industry is to convey information to the American public while they're demonizing Ivermectin. We require all legal immigrants to have a regiment of Ivermectin before they enter our country. Our government required it. How did I find that? I'm doing a little bit of research and I know the law was in it in the research that I was doing and helped me to come across it. And yet you have these arrogant, condescending people. Oh, your conspiracy theorist. My conspiracy. And then I have to switch to cross examination mode. Microsoft country, who I admitted legally have to take Ivermectin, right?

  18. 36:47

    have to now to have the option. They have to take it. Sick, man. Sick. Then you have this. It's like we're on folks having temper tantrums. So first the LA Times came out with their decision to refuse to endorse a presidential candidate. Then the very next day, the Washington Post announced that it was refusing to do so. Much to the consternation of many of the Washington Post employees. So to come right down to it, Jeff Bezos not chief when doing that because there were many in the Washington Post that wanted to endorse Kamala Harris. Well, you want to talk about a temper tantrum. You have people, all kinds of things. And then you have people like this guy, Robert Kagan, who was the Washington Post editor who resigned because of this. He resigned because of this. And then, you know, in the Washington Post is funny. I mean, you can't, you can't make your bed. There if you should lie in it, Because then it's been reported today that the Washington Post had 200,000 subscribers that said well we don't want to have the WAPO anymore. The Post said we're returning to our roots from 1950 to where we no longer endorse presidential candidates. People are commenting on livestream. Yeah, a lot of people that lost their jobs because they refuse to get, you know, get the jab. That's just the truth. And it's not only people that lost their jobs, we at AFA, we had to follow lawsuit because the government admitted a regulation that says if you employ this number of people, this number of people, your staff must receive it.

  19. 38:50

    They said, hey, what can we do? I said, well, one thing we can do is say, no, thank you. Hence we filed our lawsuit. We want the only ones, but we're among the ranks of filing a lawsuit to tell the government you can't tell us what we have to tell our staff to do. And then now we're finding all of these other things out. Now I told you guys, YouTube tried to cancel my channel because I had Dr. Parks on, I said, oh really? said to a nice little communicacion. Oh, we've concluded that you have nothing have you shared that violated our community standards. Oh, you're so charitable and generous. Yeah, right. They can read just like I can read. I ain't just talking about literacy. But it's just in this era of deception that we're in, guys, we cannot afford to neglect the resources that God has made available to us to sharpen our discernment, to sharpen our discernment, to fortify us against just being tossed to and fro, a development that I thought was interesting and not necessarily because of the persons involved, I mean, that is interesting in and of itself, but a concept that indicates that President Trump may be deviating away from what has been conventional in presidential politics. It's no doubt in my mind that he was a bit overwhelmed in 2016. Never been a politician. He'd been a businessman. He didn't know the ins and outs. When he was saying, during the swamp, he didn't know how deep the swamp was. He didn't know how far those tentacles went. His inclinations were correct and wanted to get rid of the swamp, but I don't think he understood the scope of the swamp, especially when you started to hire the swamp.

  20. 40:59

    Well, Robert Kennedy Jr. and Tossy Gabbard appeared at an event campaigning for President Trump. But then RFK Jr. said something that I thought was interesting that I wanted to bring to your attention and it has to do with the mechanism of President Trump establishing a transition team. Now, every President candidate does this. They just don't say it out loud because they have to plan to govern and always say there's a difference between campaigning and governing. of the things that I think President Trump needed to improve on. Should he be reelected? He has to have a vision for governing, not just campaigning. I think he has a natural ability to connect with people that aid him in campaigning. But that's not the same thing as governing. You know, you can be a person who's not necessarily into the minutiae of policy details, but you better have trustworthy people who are into the minutiae of policy details. I think that was one of the strengths of Ron the scientists that he had the inclinations, the instincts of President Trump, but he also had the insight, the technical insight into navigating policy, personally, not having to outsource that to other people. I thought that was one of the differences between the two of them. Well, according to Robert Kennedy Jr, President Trump is preparing to do something different. go around, should he be elected? And he's already doing some things differently. But in one particular area that I want you to hear and consider, listen to and watch this in clip number one, clip number one, go. He told us that and what he did, he didn't just promise that. But he did something no other president's done before. Normally, the transition team is not created until November because GAO, the general accounting order office pays for the transit, all the costs of the transition team. Trump said, I'm not going to do it this time. I'm not going to do it their way.

  21. 43:00

    I'm going to start my own transition team three months early. And he got private donors. He got private donors to fund it. And he's appointed 20 people, including me in Tulsi. and Tulsi. And you know, there's people of all different kinds of ideology and people who we're going to have to go up against on that transition team and fight for our vision. But I can tell you this, which is unique, there aren't no corporate lobbyists on that campaign on that transition team. That is what I found to be very, very interesting. And the reference to the GAO when the necessity of allowing the GAO to fund your transition, is one of the ways the swamp remains swampy. But to privately fund your transition, which would allow you to have people away from the GAO related processes, that's a pretty significant deal. Now let me say this. I know a lot of people are clapping and all of that, but I'm just going to say this, 10 toes to the ground flat out. I don't trust Tulsi Gabbard, and I don't trust R.F.K. Jr. I agree with him about health, wanting to be healthy, seed oils and that kind of thing, but the man has some whacked out stuff. Now I think you can, you should eat the meat and spit out the bones. I think his motivations, again, may be sincere, but as I said earlier, you can be sincere sincerely wrong, but I'm not, you know, yeah, I ain't yannin'. Potosse Gabbard, you know, I ain't Yann Farakay, RFK Jr.

  22. 45:03

    And I do not want them to be in a President Trump's cabinet. All right? Now I have to have ideas that can aid an American first agenda and things of that nature, okay? But across the board, comprehensively, you know, you talking about transition team, what exactly are they transitioning my man? That's what I wanna know. But that is not, I don't want to focus on that right now. the concept of foreclosing corporate lobbyists, excluding them from the transition process and privately funding your transition is the thing I wanted to point out as, hmm, that's worth taking note of. And could it be, you know, I might, I know this might be going out on a limb, Mr. Rosa, you know, Mr. Sparks lighting up the dark over there. What could it be? Because President Trump ain't going with the usual corporate lobby of suspects and not necessarily causing up to the war hawks in different places. Could that be why many establishmentarians are in such conipsions? Could that be why you have so many of the swamp rats bit rattled? like, hmm, maybe he's learned something from his first go around. And one of the main things he's learned is you can't drain the swamp with the swamp. You can't do that. Now, you know, by God's grace, we'll see what happens with the election. But I am, if this holds to be true, that it shows some, you know, some, some humility, which one of the things if you get shot in the ear, I think humility should be something you should be able to arrive at. Well, you recognize, man, last time I didn't do this, I need to make some adjustments. That shows some practical humility and I need to make some adjustments. And the other thing that I truly hope and pray that he's considering and is the reality is, you know, a one term, you technically in political terms, lame duck on day one. So some of the things things he should prioritize is what he can accomplish, executively, and establishing a foundation for those who would carry the banner of leadership and our nation after him, after him, while at the exact same time, should the congressional elections allow for the accommodation of a presidential agenda that he's able to show up day one and seek to implement that.

  23. 47:56

    So the idea of a privately funding the transition is one that I think is noteworthy, and I wanted you to be aware of that. Let's stay on the wall, folks. Fast, pray, and obey. Let us have not merely a vision for what transpires on Election Day, but what we will be engaged in now and after Election Day. We've been ordained for this time. Let's not miss our moment. Y'all have a great evening. Meet Kelsey. When she found out she was pregnant, she wasn't sure where to turn. But after meeting with the counselors at a pre-born network clinic who loved and supported her, and after hearing her baby's heartbeat on a free ultrasound, she chose life. When a mother looks at her child through a sonogram, it does something to you. You know, I ended up deciding to keep my son who is now five years old today. He's amazing. He brings absolute joy to my heart. I could not imagine life without him. Not only did they help me save his life, they saved my life. By introducing a woman to her baby on ultrasound, a baby's chance at life doubles. If you have the means, would you consider a leadership gift to save babies in a big way? Your tax deductible donation of $5,000 will sponsor preborn's entire network for 24 hours, helping to rescue 200 babies, to donate dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby that's pound 250 baby or donate securely at preborn.com. That's preborn.com.

Subscribe and never miss an episode.

Pick your platform All Episodes
Latest episode Book Abe